Final Blog: Digital Era

It is nearing 2023, a time when social media and the internet are starting its journey toward its peak. We live in a world today where by the click of a button the whole world can know where you live, who you are, what you do, or anything about anyone or anything. Isn't that scary? Think about how many people have phones. Think about how many people have Facebook, the internet, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, etc. Twenty years ago before many of us, young kids were even alive, the only way to send a message or get in contact was through a letter, a flip phone, or a small wall phone.

 Anyone who can use their hands is now able to have a phone and let the whole world know anything. I see kids as young as 5 and people as old as 92 using iPhones. Isn't that crazy? This is the world we now live in. Society has ended the Reactionary Era. We have now begun the Digital Era. We are in a social media pandemic. The era we are now in has slowly grown over the past 15 years and has really emerged over the last 3 years.

We now live in an era where society is controlled by social media. We now live in a world where everything is digital. We now live on a planet where the internet is our biggest resource. We are not only controlled by social media but also are in a media pandemic. A pandemic is described as a widespread occurrence of an infectious disease over a whole country or the world at a particular time. This is exactly what is happening in our world now. 

If someone has an issue with anything they go directly to social media. There are people being “canceled” left and right because of one discriminative word they say. There are tons of online protests that now are occurring. At one point almost every tweet, post, and picture had a #floyd on it. This is only the beginning. There are so many other things going on that people have not even heard of or can even comprehend.

For example, some of the most recent things that are starting to come to life are AI, Neuralink, and digital money. These are just some of the few things that are going to change our world as we know it. This is why we are living in Social Media Pandemic. We have been transforming our society over many years from analog to digital.

We now have transformed our era from analog to digital too. There are so many clear factors that show media has taken over in every aspect. Between fully online schools too mico chips being implanted in brains. Another factor is social media influencers. There are ample influencers now than there have ever been before. This is also another factor as to why we are heading to the fully digital era. Soon you will realize even regular cable tv is going to be outdated and platforms like Netflix, Hulu, amazon video, Disney plus, etc are all becoming our new version of tv.

This is just the beginning of the Digital Era. Within a few more years major changes will come and people will start to realize. One day people will even start to become outdated. The best of luck to every human. Survival of the most digitalized. 

EOTO Reaction: "Redlining"

The EOTO presentations brought many different perspectives. Each topic opened another bird's eye view of the Civil Rights Movement and the Civil Rights Acts. It was fascinating when many of the presenters spoke about how those actions during this era directly affected us too. One specific action that was said to directly affect us and ongoing children is “Redlining”. According to Cornell law school, “Redlining can be defined as a discriminatory practice that consists of the systematic denial of services such as mortgages, insurance loans, and other financial services to residents of certain areas, based on their race or ethnicity.” This started in the early 1930s with FDR’s “the new deal”. 

This act directly correlated with where African Americans are able to live and whites too. This is because these suburban houses that were being built were only able to be sold to white customers. Since only the white could live here, that meant blacks could only live in the other option, urban neighborhoods. Since whites were able to live in these luxurious, nice, and rich houses, this meant blacks were forced to live in the poor, broken-down, city areas. The reasoning behind this was that FHA believed if these African Americans were to move into these nice neighborhoods their value and merit would go down significantly. 

Since FHA believed this, this withheld loans, mortgages, and grants to be given to African Americans. When this was brought up I was in shock. I realized this was an enormous factor that put all African Americans into poverty. They had no other option but to go where they were wanted, and accepted, and could put a roof over their heads. When I heard this I also realized that these beliefs of FHA and decisions were not very long ago. To put in perspective how recent this was, my grandfather who just passed away could have read about these acts in the newspaper, talked about them, been involved, seen them on tv, etc.  The actions of the Federal Housing Administration are something we all must be aware of. The FHA affects us, and our future too. 

There are still many African Americans who have to deal with this till this day and that is truly unjust. When I started to read in-depth about redlining, I realized this is what has made black people struggle. Another factor I concluded from this was this has directly affected black kids' education. This is because I recently concluded a research study in another subject class and it shows how the neighborhood, environment, and the people you grow up around directly affect how you grow up. The study showed how people who grow up in poor neighborhoods with bad influences end up trying to be just like them when they grow up,  just like many African Americans. 

The study also showed how African Americans' test scores are significantly lower and perform worse overall compared to other kids. This was said to be because they do not have the income, environment, and support to be a better version of themselves. Many people do not realize how all of these factors connect to one another and this has put black people in a constant endless cycle of poverty, trouble, and survival mode. White people are often gifted with ample privileges any black person would die for. This is something that must come to our attention to help prevent this from happening to future kids.

Guess Who's coming to Dinner

“Guess Whos coming to Dinner” is a movie that revolves around unreliability and confusion. The movie was made in 1967. All the characters in the movie are seen as stubborn and hardheaded. They all have something to say and think about everything going on, this kept the movie entertaining. The movie's male lead role was a black man, John Prentice, played by Sidney Poitier. The movie's female lead role was a white woman, Joanna Drayton, played by Katherine Houghton. The two characters are the main couple throughout the movie. However, the twist the movie presents is this couple wants to get married. However little do they understand that a white woman and a black man getting married during this time period is a disgrace and is not accepted. 

Joanna Drayton is a white woman who thinks everything is perfect in the world, she sees no issues with anything and makes the best out of everything that comes her way. When I saw the way she acted and viewed everything in life I was like wow that's crazy, that must be super nice to be able to do that. I believe everyone should live their life somewhat similar to how Drayton does. However in reality no one is able to do that because of the world we live in today. John Prentice, a black man, is seen to have no issues, is perceived as the perfect guy, and could be described as “him”.

So, now imagine this couple together during the mid-1900s, they are truly a power couple and they have to take on everyone else in the world who does not think getting married to the opposite race is acceptable. One of the main figures who believes getting married is a disgrace is Drayton's dad.

After watching the film I found the movie's name to be ironic. This is because the movie revolves around a perfect couple who wants to get married but lives in a society where it is seen as a disgrace. The hilarious part I realized was when the producers named the movie as they did because it is supposed to represent a common joke when kids tell their parents if their significant other can come over for dinner to meet the family. But in this case, the significant other is a black flawless man. So when the father of Drayton finally meets the man his daughter wants to marry it is funny because he never thought he would be African American. 

However, in all seriousness, this is still a common issue seen today. Often children get discouraged when wanting to become friends, date, hang out, etc with another race, especially black. This is because African Americans often always get discriminated against by other people. When someone sees their child with a race that is not accepted they are seen as a disgrace. This is a cultural barrier that many people have to face. I even have faced this as a Hispanic, specifically Puerto Rican. This issue can occur with all people. For example, as a Hispanic my family expects me to speak full Spanish, date Latino girls, and become custom to all our traditions. 

This is the bar line many people have to face. This is what the “guess whos coming to dinner” main lesson is. The film is trying to show all of the barriers and hardships people have to deal with regarding this topic. The main couple has yet to realize what they desire is not accepted in society and all of the issues and hardships that are going to come with getting married to opposite races. The film in total was a very nice end-of-the-year film to really tie everything together and show how there are still many issues today that people deal with of all races. It was also nice to see the perspective of both white and black during the movie and see the lead male role being played as a black man described as flawless. 

Klansville USA Today Documentary

 

North Carolina took on the nickname “Klansville, U.S.A'' after a man named Bob Jones revitalized the Ku Klux Klan. Post-American Civil war, confederate soldiers formed the KKK in 1865. They were a violent group that targeted, attacked, or killed African Americans or those who supported them. However, the government overrode the Klan and it began to fall apart in 1871. Through this time period, the KKK did not seem to make much progress. Instead, they gathered in their white costumes, preaching violence and racist ideology against black people.

However, in 1915, the movie, “The Birth of a Nation” was the turning point for the comeback of the Klan. The movie portrayed the KKK as idols who were vital in order to re-establish the South. By 1925, four million Americans took part in the Klan. This movie was admired by many southerners, especially those of low income because they believed that black people were beginning to take over. Therefore, Bob Jones became their voice. 

Bob Jones wanted to stop the progress of the growth of opportunity for African Americans in the south. Jones worked smaller, different jobs with very little education after being emitted from the Navy when he refused to salute an African American officer. He wanted to put a halt to the uprise of African Americans before the change in the south left people like him behind. Being raised in a poor white family and accepting racist beliefs at an early age also expanded his reasons to fight against this progression. By 1963, Jones created what would become the biggest Klan group in America, and he became known as the Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan. 

As North Carolina’s government desired to continue the slow progression, there were large amounts of unrest in society. Bob Jones wanted to keep building his Klan, while the government wanted to continue paving the way for African Americans. It became a no-win situation. 

I think this documentary was a good representation of helping viewers understand why people would join the Klan in the first place. By no means is this morally justified and I think it is interesting how a movie could spark so much hate that one person would want to revitalize the Klan. However, the south would never be brought back to the racism it held prior to the war. No matter how large the Klan grew, it was not large enough to prevent African Americans from getting what they deserved.

Hazel Scott

Hazel Scott played a significant role in standing up for the justice of African Americans and furthering their progress in justice in America. She was a talented jazz pianist and singer and became a popular performer in America. One of her most remarkable achievements was becoming the first African American woman to host her own TV show. 

She was born in Trinidad on June 11, 1920, and showed early signs of natural talent by three years old, when she could play the piano by ear. Her mom was also a talented pianist and saxophonist who played in all-women bands for a career. Scott and her mother grew very close, and her mother’s connections allowed her to learn from very prominent musicians. Scott was soon accepted into the Juilliard School of Music at 8 years old. This is where her career took off and she began performing professionally. She joined her mom’s jazz band when she was 13 years old and performed on stage as an individual at the Roseland Ballroom at age 15. In 1938, she hosted her own radio show and went on Broadway in a musical. 

In 1939, her career was on a new high. She began to perform at Café Society, New York’s first unsegregated nightclub. Audiences admired Scott’s unique integration of jazz into classical music. Later on, she signed up with a prominent movie studio, RKO. However, she refused to be a singing maid and instead, appeared as herself in five films. Additionally, she demanded the same pay as white people were receiving. Taking a stand against the studio’s racist ideals caused her contract with the studio to eventually dissolve.

However, this did not stop Scott from standing up to discrimination. She was one of the first performers to refuse to play in audiences that were segregated. By 1950, she became the first African-American woman to host her own TV show that aired for 15 minutes, three times per week in New York and eventually expanded nationally. 

However, this was also short-lived. A few months later, Scott was named on Red Channels, where she was accused of supporting Communists and performing for organizations affiliated with Communists during the era of McCarthyism. She decided to testify in front of the House Un-American Activities Committee, however, she was overridden, and “The Hazel Scott Show” was canceled. Shortly after, to escape the political fallout, she moved to Paris in 1957 and began performing in Europe where she appeared in a few French films such as Le Désordre et la Nuit. Later she returned back to the United States and continued to perform in nightclubs from time to time and took part in some television, leading up to her death. She continued to display to the public that she was against McCarthyism and racism. 

Although Scott’s career did not end on the highest note, she was still deemed monumental in the movement of blacks in society. Her short-lived television show developed “a glimmer of hope for African American viewers” during a time of intense racism. She enhanced the representation of African Americans in film and was one who stood up for what she believed in, despite setbacks created by those who did not support her ideals.

University of California Medical School at Davis. v.s. Bakke

Allan Bakke a 35-year-old white male was denied from the University of California Medical School at Davis. Bakke was not only denied once but twice from this school. This medical school reserved 16 singular spots out of 100 for minority groups. The school applied this method to their classes as a solution to longstanding unequal exclusion for minorities of many other races than white. Allan Bakke was denied from this school while unqualified minorities were accepted. Bakke's qualifications were outstanding compared to all of the other minorities accepted over the two-year period that he applied.

Bakke did not believe it was fair for him to be rejected. He believed he was denied because of his race. When Bakke presented in court, he fought that the University of California violated the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause, and violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This case concluded with a common term used often. This term is known as “affirmative action”. Affirmative action is a method used often throughout the university to abolish unlawful discrimination against applicants. This method eliminates prior, present, and future restraints among all applicants. This is usually seen when people are applying for jobs, educational jobs, programs, etc.

Since the school applied an affirmative action policy that resulted in Bakke being denied twice in a row from this medical school, there was a belief it was because of his race. The case concluded in an 8-to-1 decision in favor of Bakke. Allan Bakke's case directly correlates with Brown v the Board's argument. In this case, Brown argued that the buildings and facilities for African American students were inferior to those of white children. Brown ended up winning the case because the Supreme Court favored his argument. In Brown v the Board and California v Bakke, both plaintiffs sued under the same clause.

Both the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were violated in these cases. In both of these cases, there were similar arguments against the “quota”. Bakke believed since he was white that he was not being accepted to the school, and in Brown, v the Board it was believed since the kids were black they got treated worse. Both of these cases were won in favor of the plaintiffs. This also led to a turning point in Plessy v Fuegson, this case after Brown v the Board was overturned. Allan Bakke knew that the school quota was not equal or justified, this is why he fought in the courts.

The quota made by the school was in the belief that it was treating everyone equally but in reality, there was still discrimination behind the scenes. This is exactly how the Brown v Board case was won due to inequality and violation of the 14th amendment quota. Often quotas made to allow equality end in violation of an Amendment which is often seen throughout history. This is an issue. If Bakke did not speak up then there would have been no justice and prevented future incidents like this. This case was a major turning point in history. University of California Medical School at Davis. Vs. Bakke was significant for many future cases brought to our justice system.

Also, this case brought justice to prior cases. This has allowed so many people to be protected just a tiny bit more under our country's laws. This is just the start of many more unlawful acts, but also is one step closer to the end of many more. People often do not realize how every voice matters and everyone who speaks up have power whether you are African American or any race.